Nuclear experts seek to advance ITER fusion project
July 26, 2010 by Eloi Rouyer
Tractors working on the future International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) site in Cadarache, southern France, in 2008. An explosion in costs has cast a cloud over a multi-billion-dollar nuclear fusion project aiming to make the power that fuels the Sun a practical energy source on Earth.
An explosion in costs has cast a cloud over a multi-billion-dollar nuclear fusion project aiming to make the power that fuels the sun a practical energy source on Earth.
Delays, rocketing costs and financing problems have hit the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) whose consortium members start a meeting on Tuesday aiming to get the project back on course.
ITER was set up by the European Union, which has a 45-percent share, China, India, South Korea, Japan, Russia and the United States to research a clean and limitless alternative to dwindling fossil fuel reserves by testing nuclear fusion.
Work is to start at the test reactor site at Cadarache in southern France next month, but the cost now worries many members.
The total estimated bill for the EU, the main backer, has doubled to 7.2 billion euros (9.2 billion dollars), with the overall cost now reckoned to be around 15 billion euros.
The meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday in Cadarche of ITER's council members marks the start of the construction phase and comes after the EU pledged to pump in extra funds to keep the project going.
The European Commission, the EU executive arm, this month offered to fork out an extra 1.4 billion euros to fulfil Europe's commitment to the project, but this needs the approval of EU member states.
ITER's administrative headquarters and two buildings housing equipment will be the first to be started.
This week's meeting is also expected to name Japanese physicist Osamu Motojima as ITER's new boss, to replace his compatriot Kaname Ikeda.
Launched in 2006 after years of debate, the scheme aims to build a testbed to see whether fusion, so far achieved in a handful of labs at great cost, can be a feasible power source.
Nuclear fusion entails forcing together the nuclei of light atomic elements in a super-heated plasma, held in a doughnut-shaped chamber called a tokamak, so that they make heavier elements and in so doing release energy.
ITER's council decided last November to abandon its goal of 2018 to obtain the first plasma, and in March it said November 2019 was its new target.
ITER is designed to produce 500 megawatts of power for extended periods, 10 times the energy needed to keep the energy-generating plasma -- a form of radioactive gas -- at extremely high temperatures.
It will also test a number of key technologies for fusion including the heating, control and remote maintenance that will be needed for a full-scale fusion power station.
Preliminary trials would use only hydrogen. Key experiments using tritium and deuterium that can validate fusion as a producer of large amounts of power would not take place until 2026.
The process of nuclear fusion, used by the sun and other stars, would be safe and have negligible problems of waste, say its defenders.
In contrast, nuclear fission, which entails splitting the nucleus of an atom to release energy, remains dogged by concerns about safety and dangerously radioactive long-term waste.
If ITER is a success, the next step would be to build a commercial reactor, a goal likely to be further decades away.
(c) 2010 AFP
-
Nuclear fusion power project to start in 2018: official
Jun 18, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Nuclear fusion power project to start in slimmed-down version
Jun 08, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Fusion technology: from ANU to the world
Jun 30, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Ministers to initial ITER agreement in Brussels
May 19, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Nations Sign Nuclear Fusion Reactor Pact
Nov 21, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Physical laws .... are they material?!!
1 hour ago
-
increasing time of daylight
1 hour ago
-
Light & Sight
2 hours ago
-
Wind Turbine Power
5 hours ago
-
Steam Table issues
7 hours ago
-
electrostatic induction in a conductor should be immpossible
10 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
29 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Hovering not hard if you're top-heavy, researchers find
Top-heavy structures are more likely to maintain their balance while hovering in the air than are those that bear a lower center of gravity, researchers at New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences ...
1 hour ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
1
|
SLAC, Stanford team focuses on high-energy electrons to treat cancer
Accelerator physicists at SLAC and cancer specialists from Stanford are working on a new technology that could dramatically reduce the time needed for cancer radiation treatments. The team ran an initial experiment ...
4 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Measurements from high-energy collisions lead to better understanding of why meson particles disappear
For several years, physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), USA, have studied an unusual state of matter called the quarkgluon plasma, which they ...
5 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible
(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...
Employers feel no love for unscrupulous practice of 'service sweethearting'
A new study led by two Florida State University marketing professors finds that some frontline service employees who are rewarded for hikes in customer loyalty and satisfaction also may engage in "service ...
US issues guidelines to avoid heparin contamination
Four years after US drug-maker Baxter International's blood thinner heparin was contaminated in China, causing dozens of deaths, US regulators on Friday issued draft guidelines for safe production.
Expat French get Internet vote for first time
French citizens will for the first time this year be able to vote in a parliamentary election over the Internet, an experiment that could be extended to other elections if successful.
"Twisted Metal" gamers get shot at real gunplay
Fans of "Twisted Metal" will get to welcome a long-awaited sequel of the car-battle videogame with a real-world bang by blasting an ice cream truck to bits with a machine gun.
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
I hope they settle on some nice pile of cash for the contractors and get going with this program. We certainly need another source of energy.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
It is after all how all of these big projects turn out, you would have thought by now the politicians would just automatically double what ever they were told and then add another 20% to that to get the real figure ;-)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (4)
I think we should walk before we try to run, spend some more millions on R&D before we flush billions down the toilet.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
http://en.wikiped...Polywell
I think we should walk before we try to run, spend some more millions on R&D before we flush billions down the toilet.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
http://en.wikiped...Polywell
I think we should walk before we try to run, spend some more millions on R&D before we flush billions down the toilet.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Well, the good news is that the development is proceeding (under a US Navy contract iirc), and it appears that he left behind a capable team to continue the R&D. It's encouraging that they seem to have reached their projections at every step so far.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (6)
But seriously, 9 billion dollars? That's chump change when you consider how much cash is thrown around for this and that. If the world would re-prioritize itself and put science higher on the list, we'd have fusion, or at least a better energy source than we do now. We'd have amazing medical tech, and be on Mars. considering how much science actually gets in funding, it's amazing how much is achieved.
Here's the best situation-
World: "here science, here's 500 billion dollars we've collected among us."
Science: "Thank you, all major problems will be solved soon. War, hunger, disease, etc. "
World: "Really?"
Science:"Yes, we can find the answers, we always could've, we just never had the support we needed"
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (27)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (9)
Each one is a huge fatass black hole sucking down taxpayer dollars that could have been spent on better things than giant corporate welfare programs. Like housing for the people, like guaranteed annual income, like environmental protection. The list goes on and on. End it now before riots do.
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Magnetic confinement rings are the only known way of storing large amounts of plasma. Tokamak research is refining the methods of doing this.
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (6)
As was pointed out above, tokamaks are the most appropriate testbed for many related technologies including materials, shielding, energy extraction, cryogenics; and they do generate a large supply base and provide employment for a large number of people, which is a good thing.
The international community has more experience with tokamaks, and they offer the best alternative for storing large amounts of plasma for extended periods of time. Stellerators are too complex and difficult to fabricate; spheromak or levitating dipole designs are too sloppy and do not effectively and efficiently contain the plasma without contamination.
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
Developing the tech and the expertise by building a space station are far more important than anything we might actually do with it once its built.
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
There has been a long line of research tokamaks that lead up to ITER that demonstrate various principles. While there is a long list of problems or shortcomings ITER could have, it is far from saying there are 'no reasons' it should work. ITER would be an incremental improvement, not a revolutionary new project out of nowhere.
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
As someone who works on an alternative confinement project, I still think tokamaks are currently the most promising option we have and not fringe. While I think there should be more research of alternative concepts, they need a lot more small scale work before moving to something the scale of ITER. It is real easy for something that works well on the benchtop to develop problems and instabilities when made larger. So such projects need to justify that things will scale up to an incrementally bigger project with data, the same path tokamaks took, otherwise we would burn money much faster than ITER possibly could.
Also, ITER community is well aware of the neutron output and it will take much longer than hours to become radioactive scrap.
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Dust in fusion devices
R.D. Smirnov, S.I. Krasheninnikov, A.Yu. Pigarov, D.L. Rudakov, J.H. Yu, M. Rosenberg, A. Mendis, D. Benson (UCSD)
W.P. West, R.L. Boivin, B.D. Bray, N.H. Brooks,
A.W. Hyatt, C.P.C. Wong (GA)
A.L. Roquemore, D.K. Mansfield, C.H. Skinner (PPPL)
J.L. Terry, B. Lipschultz, A. Bader, R.S. Granetz (MIT)
T.D. Rognlien (LLNL), Y. Tanaka (Kanazawa Univ.)
J. Nichols (Cornell Univ.)
19thConference on Plasma Surface Interactions
May 25th2010, San Diego, CA USA
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Jul 28, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
http://www.crossf...iew.html
Jul 28, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Thanks for the heads up. I found the presentation quite interesting. Here's a link to it: https://fusion.ga.../Session 6/PSI19_presentation_Smirnov.pdf
Jul 28, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Jul 28, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Which is why they are working on designing parts and materials that will not become radioactive waste when exposed to neutrons (e.g. lithium). Or at least be made of materials that are easy to be replaced and will be activated to isotopes with a short halflife, such that radioactivity goes away after a few years in storage. There are whole research programs, like IFMIF, to studying just the materials to be used in plasma facing components in addition to the work at ITER itself.
The main downside is that I think a large factor in ITER's cost is designing it to be remotely assembled and maintained. That way so they can deal with activated materials that have not had time to cool down without exposing workers. They want to test out such technology from the start, long before D-T fusion and potential activation issues.