Childhood memories of father have lasting impact on men's ability to handle stress

August 12, 2010

Sons who have fond childhood memories of their fathers are more likely to be emotionally stable in the face of day-to-day stresses, according to psychologists who studied hundreds of adults of all ages.

Psychology professor Melanie Mallers, PhD, of California State University-Fullerton presented the findings Thursday at the 118th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association.

"Most studies on parenting focus on the relationship with the mother. But, as our study shows, fathers do play a unique and important role in the mental health of their children much later in life," Mallers said during a symposium focusing on social relationships and well-being.

For this study, 912 adult men and women completed short daily telephone interviews about that day's experiences over an eight-day period. The interviews focused on the participants' psychological and (i.e., whether they were depressed, nervous, sad, etc.) and if they had experienced any stressful events that day. These events were described as arguments, disagreements, work-related and family-related tensions and discrimination.

The participants, who were between the ages of 25 and 74, also reported on the quality of their childhood relationships with their mother and father. For example, they answered questions such as, "How would you rate your relationship with your mother during the years when you were growing up?" and "How much time and attention did your mother give you when you needed it?" The same questions were asked about fathers. The research controlled for age, childhood and current family income, neuroticism and whether or not their parents were still alive.

Participants were more likely to say their childhood relationship with their mother was better than with their father, with more men reporting a better mother-child relationship than women, according to Mallers. People who reported they had a good mother-child relationship reported 3 percent less psychological distress compared to those who reported a poor relationship.

"I don't think these results are surprising, given that past research has shown are often the primary caregiver and often the primary source of comfort," said Mallers. "It got interesting when we examined the participants' relationship with their fathers and their daily emotional reaction to stress."

Men who reported having a good relationship with their father during childhood were more likely to be less emotional when reacting to stressful events in their current daily lives than those who had a poor relationship, according to her findings. This was not found to be as common for the women in the study.

Also, the quality of mother and father relationships was significantly associated with how many stressful events the participants confronted on a daily basis. In other words, if they had a poor childhood relationship with both parents, they reported more stressful incidents over the eight-day study when compared to those who had a good relationship with their parents.

Mallers theorized why healthy or unhealthy relationships may have an effect on how people handle stress as adults. "Perhaps having attentive and caring parents equips children with the experiences and skills necessary to more successfully navigate their relationships with other people throughout and into adulthood," she said.

She added it was difficult to come up with a concrete theory as to why men's with their father had such an influence on their emotional reaction to stress, especially since this study included adults of all ages who were raised during very different eras in the United States.

"The role of fathers has changed dramatically from the time the oldest participants were children," added Mallers. "We do know that fathers have a unique style of interacting with their children, especially their sons. We need more research to help us uncover further influences of both mothers and on the enduring emotional experiences of their children."

Provided by American Psychological Association (news : web)

2.5 /5 (4 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

freethinking
Aug 12, 2010

Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
This is no suprise at all and has been known for years. Conservatives, especially Christian Conservatives have been saying for many years children need both a mother and a father. That crime rates go up when fathers are absent. That poverty rates go up when fathers are absent. That single parenthood is bad for children. That two mothers is bad for children. That two fathers are bad for children. That traditional families are statistically best for children.
ClickHere
Aug 12, 2010

Rank: 3.3 / 5 (4)
@freethinking, I agree, the writing has been on the wal from some time, whole families are better for family members. It could easily be construed this is an evolutionary adaptation: children who have complete families are more likely to reproduce and create more complete families.
henryjfry
Aug 13, 2010

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Ahh but is this purely an issue of the sex of the parent or to the presence of a father figure? Bigoted comments above say that vs a nuclear family 2 dads and 2 mums are worse. Surely it would be more logical to conclude that a loving environment is better irrespective of the sex of the parents.
complexChemicals
Aug 13, 2010

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
it aint about conservative mother and fathering, its about anyones mother and father (whomever is filling those roles) and having a good report with them at a young age and that effect on stress management.

Sheesh.
freethinking
Aug 13, 2010

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
To progressives any type of family is just as good or better for raising children than a traditional family. They always take the example of the worst traditional family, one where the mother is a drug addict, and the father is a pedophile, then compare them to a single mother or a gay couple can raise a child better.

However the truth is traditional families are stastistically better and safer and have better outcomes for children than any other family arrangement.
DaffyDuck
Aug 13, 2010

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
freethinking, you seem to have conclusions that weren't even tested for this article. It is comparing people with good vs bad fathers, not people raised with and without fathers. I can equally conclude that no father is better than an abusive father by reading this article.

Since we are making our own conclusions here I'll say that the social, economic, and educational background of parents makes much more difference than the number or sexual orientation of parents.
Skeptic_Heretic
Aug 13, 2010

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
However the truth is traditional families are stastistically better and safer and have better outcomes for children than any other family arrangement.

Typically when someone starts a sentence with "The truth is" that means they're lining you up for the biggest fabrication they can imagine.

There are no statistical studies that apply any significance to the composition of a family and the potential outcome for social adjustment.

There are many that correlate wealth with adjustment.

There are many that correlate wealth with cohesiveness of the family unit.

There are many that show that outcome and cohesiveness are higher and of better quality in a homosexual couple over a traditional couple.

So in short, you're a bigoted douche. If you want to play the study game, most studies indicate a child's best chance for a happy adult life and good social adjustment would be a cohesive homosexual parent team.

So stick it, redneck.
henryjfry
Aug 18, 2010

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
freethinking how about the wasp family where the mother and father absolutely loathe each other but won't get divorced because they are too conservative? Would it be better for a child to be raised in a love-less family like that than to 2 homosexual parents who love each other?
"However the truth is traditional families are statistically better and safer and have better outcomes for children than any other family arrangement." Oh yeah, prove it. What statistics do you have that say they are "better". Define better.
I think what you probably mean is less gay, because you are a bigot.
freethinking
Aug 18, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
h 1'st question, answer statistically is no. By staying together the family actually (statistically) has less stree, they are financially more stable, both parents are immediately available to their children.
Second question, taking the worst and combining it with the best is what progressives do.
Third, just because I have a different opinion back by facts, doesnt mean I'm a bigot. Typically the bigot is the person who says gay arrangements are equal or better than traditional famililies and you prove the point. You seem to be the typical progressive filled with hate, that projects your bigotry and hatred onto others.

I believe that if your stupid enough to live in a gay relationship, bring kids into the mix, that is your problem and you will live with the concequences, unless the government forces me to bale you out. Just don't say its the best arrangement for society. Its like the rare drunk who drives better drunk than sober saying everone should drive drunk. Its stupid
Skeptic_Heretic
Aug 18, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Typically the bigot is the person who says gay arrangements are equal or better than traditional famililies and you prove the point. You seem to be the typical progressive filled with hate, that projects your bigotry and hatred onto others.

The irony and hilarity in this comment are unreal.
freethinking
Aug 18, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Progressives start name calling when they they have nothing else to stand on. SH you prove that point often.
Skeptic_Heretic
Aug 18, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Progressives start name calling when they they have nothing else to stand on.
And what would you say you've done above?

Inadvertant comedy is most certainly your strong suit.
VOR
Sep 06, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
man I wish there was an ignore button on here like on yahoo. Freethinking heads that wishlist.
Rank 2.5 /5 (4 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Is Everyday Technology Killing Us?
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • Exercise and weight loss
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • Why do we have head aches? Our brains can't feel anything.
    createdFeb 07, 2012
  • "The end of diseases" by David Agus, interview from Daily Show with Jon Stewart
    createdFeb 04, 2012
  • Oncolytic adenovirus
    createdFeb 04, 2012
  • Nutrition label stuffs and diets
    createdFeb 02, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences

More news stories

Researchers weigh in on ethics of H5N1 research

(Medical Xpress) -- In a commentary on the biosecurity controversy surrounding publication of bird flu research details, a bioethicist and a vaccine expert at Johns Hopkins reaffirm that "all scientists have an affirmativ ...

Medicine & Health / Other

created 43 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

First prospective clinical trial of adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients

Researchers led by a senior investigator at Hofstra-North Shore LIJ School of Medicine and The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research have released initial findings from a first-of-a-kind clinical trial in adaptive radiotherapy ...

Medicine & Health / Cancer

created 30 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Shorter hospital stay for knee replacement linked with greater revision, mortality risks

No previous research has quantified and compared the costs and outcomes between total knee replacement (TKR) patients who have differing lengths of hospital stay following surgery.

Medicine & Health / Other

created 33 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Scientists identify most lethal known species of prion protein

Scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute have identified a single prion protein that causes neuronal death similar to that seen in "mad cow" disease, but is at least 10 times more ...

Medicine & Health / Research

created 1 hour ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

To perform with less effort, practice beyond perfection

Whether you are an athlete, a musician or a stroke patient learning to walk again, practice can make perfect, but more practice may make you more efficient, according to a surprising new University of Colorado Boulder study.

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created 1 hour ago | popularity 4.2 / 5 (5) | comments 1 | with audio podcast


Ultraviolet protection molecule in plants yields its secrets

Lying around in the sun all day is hazardous not just for humans but also for plants, which have no means of escape. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun can damage proteins and DNA inside cells, leading ...

Deconstructing a mystery: What caused Snowmaggedon?

In the quiet after the storms, streets and cars had all but disappeared under piles of snow. The U.S. Postal Service suspended service for the first time in 30 years. Snow plows struggled to push the evidence ...

Barriers fall between TV, Internet

You say TV, I say Internet. Toe-mate-o, toe-mah-to.

NASA sees Tropical Storm 12S - a possible threat to Madagascar

The twelfth tropical depression formed in the Southern Indian Ocean today and quickly became a tropical storm, dubbed Tropical Storm 12S. NASA's Aqua satellite passed over the storm and captured infrared data that revealed ...

Materials that shrink when heated

One common reason that people with fillings experience toothache is that their fillings expand at a different rate to the original tooth when, for example, drinking a hot drink. Contrary to intuition, however, ...

Hydrogen from acidic water: Researchers develop potential low cost alternative to platinum for splitting water

A technique for creating a new molecule that structurally and chemically replicates the active part of the widely used industrial catalyst molybdenite has been developed by researchers with the Lawrence Berkeley ...