Virology Journal retracts paper on Jesus curing possible case of influenza

Poor excuses for scientists. Imho.

The FACT one believes does NOT preclude one from debate based in science and BECAUSE one 'mentions' the Bible does not make "fairy tale" comments acceptable.

Answer: "The percentage of Christians in the U.S. are between 0.1 and 75% of the total population"

It seems the commentators here think 'scientists' are something other than people. We're not. Why the need to punish or feel superior?

Relax everybody, no harm, no foul.

Quote: And why did Jesus take 3 DAYS
Answer: The SAME 'reason' he got back a certain NUMBER of loaves and fishes.

Students will begin to understand
the
deeper meanings of names, places and numbers found in the Bible, and
will uncover an infinite source of illumination and wisdom.

Sounds like to me this thread is becoming the personal sounding board for atheists ..

The thread is about Science and UNLESS you ask a SPECIFIC question ABOUT religion ON this thread your attempting denigration of religion is but a sign of your small .. dck.

creates human fallacy like the AGW debate and the vaccination scare.

Answer: Did I insult atheists .. ? I don't think I insulted atheists . If I insulted you .. show me. Until then I wouldn't be trying to recommend ANYTHING to ME.

He sure cuddles up to atheists . If it looks like smells like and tastes like .. it probably is.

I believe the atheists MUST be **monitored** because their INFLUENCES as to targeting and attacking medical studies based ON merely the mention of religion is OVERBOARD.

Quote: Did I insult atheists ?

Answer : I simply asked a statistical question as to 'the odds that Jesus is mentioned and atheists being closely involved in the removal of the article. You seem to WANT to take it to some level ?
Mr. Bob O'Hara purports to be married to one grrrlscientist a RABID atheist. Therefore the ODDS .. are .. quite high that atheists were involved in the removal of this article. Actually the queen of atheists is married to the man who seems to have caused an article to be removed from a journal in only two weeks. He must be a persuasive fella. Imho.

Answer: Did I insult atheists .. ? I don't think I insulted atheists. If I insulted you .. show me.

I believe the atheists MUST be **monitored** because their INFLUENCES as to targeting and attacking medical studies based ON merely the mention of religion is OVERBOARD. Poor excuses for scientists. Imho.

Until then I wouldn't be trying to recommend ANYTHING to ME.

THAT smacks of cyberbullying.

I speculated "atheists are involved" and my speculation PROVED to be true. IF there WAS an "astonishing backlash against a medical speculation" and this astonishing backlash against a MEDICAL JOURNAL was PROMOTED by ANY of the atheist sites using the tactics they use in OTHER venues it becomes a matter to be INVESTIGATED by the PROPER authorities so that the journal the author and BOTH peer reviewers are EXHONERATED and given an apology. Period. BEFORE it escalates into a full blown atheist ROUTING. Imho.

Imho.

That what and due to, and must influences, on overboard; much sheer number. What belief knows seems comparable. Believe about told by, due to of you taught unbelievable other fact, not because overwhelming fact believe minority. Where rights if everytime speak right everytime, because are must! Unless specific about on anything. Me want rabid odds.

Quote: I challenge you to name an accurate contemporary medical study that didn't involve atheists.

Answer: I suppose we could start with this guy. I'm pretty sure he steers well clear of your TYPE.
"Dr. Andrew Wakefield was named Dean of Campbell University Divinity School"

If I could have given you a 10 stars instead of the maximum of 5 stars I would have. That is one of the best laughs I have had in months. Great job.

Quote: I challenge you to name an accurate contemporary medical study that didn't involve atheists.

Answer: I suppose we could start with this guy. I'm pretty sure he steers well clear of your TYPE.
"Dr. Andrew Wakefield was named Dean of Campbell University Divinity School"

To even think ironjustice would use him as an example of an "accurate paper" is amazing.

Quote: Yep, simple troll.
Answer: In case you might have failed to understand .. I read little of your tripe ..

It has been speculated atheists were involved in this retraction and it was PROVEN. Nothing else really needs to be said directly TO me.

The gang of three, who are godless atheists, want to push their agenda on the teachers and students at our schools and universities."

PZed Myers - "godless liberal"

And sadly Texas still dictates what goes into our public school books... Look even he pope has said Creationism isn't "Science" and should not be regarded as Science, therefore it shouldn't be in a High School Science Book.

ironjustice: You consider Wakefield's paper to be an example of a good Christian who produced a good medical paper. Is that correct?

ironjustice: You consider Wakefield's paper to be an example of a good Christian who produced a good medical paper. Is that correct?

I know very little about the Wakefield controversy but have wondered WHY the atheists seem to be sooo 'involved' in the work of some researcher with so many papers published.

Whether I do the data-mining that is required is to be decided in the future because frankly just interacting with atheists leaves kind of a foul taste due to their lack of class morals and bravado. Which in my world are ALL that MAKE a man.

frankly just interacting with atheists leaves kind of a foul taste due to their lack of class morals and bravado. Which in my world are ALL that MAKE a man.

...frankly just interacting with atheists leaves kind of a foul taste due to their lack of class morals and bravado. Which in my world are ALL that MAKE a man.

Quote: What kind of morality is it
Answer: If I recall correctly the last meeting by you atheists in Australia had you all rallying about how to screw a dog. The kind of morality that DOESN'T teach full grown men HOW to screw a dog.
Now .. atheists .. giiiiit ..
You seem to be gathering ..

Quote: What kind of morality is it
Answer: If I recall correctly the last meeting by you atheists in Australia had you all rallying about how to screw a dog. The kind of morality that DOESN'T teach full grown men HOW to screw a dog.
Now .. atheists .. giiiiit ..
You seem to be gathering ..

Nice thing to observe.
Doing some observational science on these posts.
All ironjustice comments rank (1/5) 3.
All others rank mostly (5/5) 3.
reason? A good Christian does not seem to rank to 1 for an opinion, unless he finds an error that is objective from his standpoint?
Atheists rank to 1 for the same reason? To me it appears that they think it is objective to rank to 1 for religious comments. However sometimes the atheists seem to loose objectivity and rank 1 blinded by some subjectivity.
That is bullying.

I think that "ironjustice" must be a mischievous person taking the urine and having a good laugh as he eggs you all on. Surely, no normal sane person could be such an arrogant bigot!

Nice thing to observe.
Doing some observational science on these posts.
All ironjustice comments rank (1/5) 3.
All others rank mostly (5/5) 3.

Atheists rank to 1 for the same reason? To me it appears that they think it is objective to rank to 1 for religious comments.

However sometimes the atheists seem to loose objectivity and rank 1 blinded by some subjectivity.
That is bullying.

No - it's just showing one's flags in order to maintain that comfy group feeling.

I think that "ironjustice" must be a mischievous person taking the urine and having a good laugh as he eggs you all on. Surely, no normal sane person could be such an arrogant bigot!

That's the reason few non-militants, if any, take part. Thus, the rankings are confined to the extreme values.

Anyone calling Dr. Andrew Wakefield "a good christian and scientist" is doing favors for neither Christianity nor Science.

In other words the state sacrifices people for the sake of "need for speed". Correct me if I am wrong.

If vaccines cause sporadic cases of autism then be it..

Problem is just that none of such statements can be said aloud.

99% of the people are not able to eat any of those statements. Even if true.

if we lower the speedlimit on the roads by 20%, then we will see a reduction in deaths by car accidents.
If we lower the speedlimits by 40% then we will see an even bigger reduction of victims.

Have fun walking to work, or better yet just stay at home to really minimize your risk.