Physicists may have observed Hawking radiation for the first time
September 28, 2010 by Lisa Zyga
In the experimental set-up, a laser beam strikes a sample of fused silica glass (FS). An imaging lens (I) collects the photons emitted at 90 degrees and sends them to a spectrometer and CCD camera. Image credit: F. Belgiorno, et al.
(PhysOrg.com) -- In 1974, Stephen Hawking predicted that black holes emit thermal radiation due to quantum effects, which causes the black holes to lose mass and perhaps ultimately vanish. But despite numerous attempts to observe Hawking radiation, astronomers have so far detected no sign of it. Now, however, a team of scientists from Italy claims to have observed something that looks very much like Hawking radiation from an event hole horizon they created in the lab.
Franco Belgiorno at the University of Milan and his coauthors will publish their study in a future issue of Physical Review Letters, and the paper is currently available on arXiv.org.
As the physicists explain in their study, the essential ingredient of Hawking radiation is not the black hole itself but rather the space-time curvature associated with the black hole's event horizon. The event horizon acts as a boundary beyond which light cannot escape. So particle pairs excited from the vacuum that form close to the black hole horizon are split so that the inner photon falls in and the outer photon escapes, gaining energy at the expense of the black hole.
Event horizons are not unique to black holes; they can be exhibited in a variety of physical systems, from flowing water to a moving “refractive index perturbation” (RIP) in a dielectric medium (in which light can change the medium's refractive index). It's this latter system that Belgiorno and his colleagues used in their experiment.
To create the Hawking radiation, the scientists fired ultrashort (1-picosecond) laser pulses at transparent glass, which excited an RIP that exhibited an event horizon. Using a CCD camera, the researchers detected a peculiar kind of photon emission at a 90-degree angle to the glass. As the researchers explained, they arranged the experiment in a way to strongly suppress or eliminate other types of radiation, such as Cerenkov-like radiation, four wave mixing, self-phase modulation, Rayleigh scattering, and fluorescence.
“[W]e report experimental evidence of photon emission that on one hand bears the characteristics of Hawking radiation and on the other is distinguishable and thus separate from other known photon emission mechanisms,” the physicists wrote in their study. “We therefore interpret the observed photon emission as an indication of Hawking radiation induced by the analogue event horizon.”
Interestingly, the physicists note that there are actually two event horizons associated with the RIP. Besides the black hole horizon, there is also the black hole horizon's inverse called a white hole horizon. As the laser light approaches the RIP, the light experiences an increase in the local refractive index, causing it to slow down. Under appropriate conditions, the light can be brought to a standstill in the reference frame comoving with the RIP, which forms a boundary beyond which light is unable to penetrate: the white hole event horizon. In the case of the RIP, the leading edge is the analogue of the black hole horizon and the trailing edge is the analogue of the white hole horizon.
With these observations, the physicists have shown that it's possible to investigate the physics of black hole evaporation in other, more accessible systems. If future experiments confirm that this is Hawking radiation, the results could have implications on everything from the fate of black holes to how the universe may end.
More information: F. Belgiorno, et al. "Hawking radiation from ultrashort laser pulse filaments." Physical Review Letters. To be published. Available at arXiv:1009.4634v1.
via: The Physics ArXiv Blog
© 2010 PhysOrg.com
-
Researchers propose new way to reproduce a black hole
Aug 21, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
The Edge of a Black Hole
Aug 18, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Our universe at home within a larger universe? So suggests wormhole research
Apr 06, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Black Holes: Eternal Prisons No More, Stephen Hawking's Lecture
Mar 16, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Astronomers shed surprising light on our galaxy's black hole
Jan 10, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Stars containing dark matter should look different from other stars
Feb 20, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (17) |
11
-
Physicists discover evidence of rare hypernucleus, a component of strange matter
Feb 17, 2012 |
4.7 / 5 (38) |
22
-
Fast photon control brings quantum photonic technologies closer
Feb 13, 2012 |
5 / 5 (8) |
1
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (36) |
32
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
taking mechanical physics next fall
1 hour ago
-
Help: maximum force of an object when given impulse and time on a graph
4 hours ago
-
Impulse, momentum, and force during motion around a circle
7 hours ago
-
Help needed to find the best fit to an angular distribution
7 hours ago
-
What is centripetal force
11 hours ago
-
Magnetic Reynolds Number
11 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Researchers build first physical 'metatronic' circuit
(PhysOrg.com) -- The technological world of the 21st century owes a tremendous amount to advances in electrical engineering, specifically, the ability to finely control the flow of electrical charges using ...
6 hours ago |
4.7 / 5 (15) |
5
|
Faster than light neutrinos? More like faulty wiring
You can shelf your designs for a warp drive engine (for now) and put the DeLorean back in the garage; it turns out neutrinos may not have broken any cosmic speed limits after all.
6 hours ago |
4.3 / 5 (19) |
20
|
Physicists surprised by disappearing and reappearing superconductivity in iron selenium chalcogenides
Superconductivity is a rare physical state in which matter is able to conduct electricity -- maintain a flow of electrons -- without any resistance. This phenomenon can only be found in certain materials at low temperatures, ...
10 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
1
|
Less is more: Study of tiny droplets could have big impact on industrial applications
(PhysOrg.com) -- Under a microscope, a tiny droplet slides between two fine hairs like a roller coaster on a set of rails until poof it suddenly spreads along them, a droplet no more.
7 hours ago |
3 / 5 (2) |
0
|
Study reveals switching mechanism in promising computer memory device
(PhysOrg.com) -- Sometimes knowing that a new technology works is not enough. You also must know why it works to get marketplace acceptance. New information from the National Institute of Standards and Technology ...
14 hours ago |
4 / 5 (4) |
0
|
Spitzer finds solid buckyballs in space
(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers using data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope have, for the first time, discovered buckyballs in a solid form in space. Prior to this discovery, the microscopic carbon spheres ...
Scientists create potent molecules aimed at treating muscular dystrophy
While RNA is an appealing drug target, small molecules that can actually affect its function have rarely been found. But now scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute have for the first time designed ...
Stanford research team cracks animated NuCaptcha
(PhysOrg.com) -- The research team from Stanford University, led by Elie Bursztein, that previously had cracked regular CAPTCHAs and then audio CAPTCHAs, now has also successfully cracked the animated version called NuCapt ...
Surprising diversity at a synapse hints at complex diversity of neural circuitry
A new study reveals a dazzling degree of biological diversity in an unexpected place a single neural connection in the body wall of flies.
Researchers discover how different nanomaterial surfaces affect proteins
A new study led by nanotechnology and biotechnology experts at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute is providing important details on how proteins in our bodies interact with nanomaterials. In their new study, published in the ...
Flesh-eating bacteria inspire superglue
(PhysOrg.com) -- A bio-inspired superglue has been developed by Oxford University researchers that cant be matched for sticking molecules together and not letting go.
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (6)
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (6)
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (10)
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (4)
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
... green banana umbrella coolea happy happy turn...
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (14)
Energy inherits frequency with approach to mass, the closer to the event the more frequent the occurrence.
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (15)
Photons do not have antiparticles, virtual photon particle pairs do not exist. We can take a photon ( 1 ) and from it derive a particle pair ( +1/2,-1/2 ) but photons do not virtually spark into existence as their annihilation would never take place. Photons do not have antiparticles.
This experiment is flawed.
V
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (12)
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
http://en.wikiped...adiation
"Under experimentally achievable conditions for gravitational systems this effect is too small to be observed directly. However, a recent experiemental set-up created a laboratory "white hole event horizon" that the experimenters claimed was shown to radiate Hawking radiation. Some scientists predict that Hawking radiation could be studied by analogy using sonic black holes, in which sound perturbations are analogous to light in a gravitational black hole and the flow of an approximately perfect fluid is analogous to gravity."
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (5)
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (15)
http://www.perime...604f.pdf
It's logical, because vacuum is behaving analogously to water surface in most of situations. After all, this is why dense aether theory was introduced. It's funny to observe, how laymans are fighting against water surface models here - whereas mainstream scientists are using them routinely.
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Hawking radiation is primarily thermal radiation that emulates a perfect black body energy spectrum:
“Hawking radiation (also known as Bekenstein-Hawking radiation) is a thermal radiation with a black body spectrum”
http://en.wikiped...adiation
However if the temperature of the black hole becomes high enough (i.e. if the black hole is much smaller than the Moon…such as a primordial black hole), pair production of particles with rest mass begins:
“If the Hawking temperature exceeds the rest mass energy of a particle type, then the black hole radiates particles and antiparticles of that type, in addition to photons”
http://casa.color...awk.html
The particle (photon, positron, etc) that crosses the event horizon is treated as a particle with negative energy, thereby reducing the mass of the black hole.
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
That's incorrect - vacuum fluctuations are predominantly virtual photon pairs that constantly annihilate because photons are their own antiparticle:
"Some particles are their own antiparticles, the antiparticle of a photon is a photon for instance."
http://www2.slac....ary.html
It's the acceleration field of the black hole that rends these virtual photon pairs apart before they annihilate, which is the underlying mechanism behind Hawking radiation.
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (14)
Photon-photon virtual pairs have a fundamental flaw. Virtual particles come into existence as opposites on the electromagnetic spectrum, while it is true, photons have a collective net charge of zero, they're neutral, they are not true opposites as, after all, they are one and the same.
The Higgs field is a neutral field, light traversing this field is massless, it is equally above ( in the positive ) and below ( in the negative ) the neutral mass threshold.
A particle such as an electron lays in the negative part of the Higgs field, it has mass. A positron lays in the positive portion of the field. When a positron and an electron meet they are together massless yet energetic, they are an electron and a positron no more, they revert to pure massless energy, a photon. When a particle and antiparticle meet the result is a photon.
Sep 28, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (13)
Particle antiparticle pairs are opposites, a vibration of the Higgs field, they spark into existence and then disappear ( massively ) leaving massless radiation, light.
Sep 29, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
?? This isn’t making any sense to me at all. What “opposites on the electromagnetic spectrum?” Do you mean “opposite charges?”
Some would say that opposite chirality and impulse are sufficient to define a particle/antiparticle pair (a photon/antiphoton pair, for example)…
Do you have sources? I’d like to see them now please. Electrons and positrons both have demonstrably positive and equal masses, yet you seem to be equating electrical polarity with positive and negative mass.
Sep 29, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Sep 29, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Sep 29, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (12)
1. Yes. Em is 1/4 known forces, it has to do with charge.
2. Some would say if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.
3. No mention of negative mass anywhere. The Higgs field gives the negatively charged electrons their mass and also gives the positively charged positrons their mass. The two are gravitationally attracted as well as electromagnetically attracted. This is why they annihilate in a flash of light ( photon ). Photons do not self annihilate as they are not attracted gravitationally or electromagnetically ( zero net charge and zero mass ). They do not self annihilate which is half the definition of virtual particles therefore they are not their own antiparticles.
Sep 29, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (13)
I think I know what has got you lost. Light being massless as a result of being equally in the positive and negative end of the Higgs Field ( space-time ).
This is not due to a net mass of zero ( as in +1 g and -1 g ), light is massless due to a net charge of zero ( as in +1 ev and -1 ev ). Why you ask? This is because we have a directional translayance through space, if the light had a net charge of anything but zero light would be massive. With each electronvolt of charge we venture further directionally into the Higgs field, the further we are in the field whether negatively/positively charged the more mass we have. The more energy the more mass. Simple, right? Light is neither negative nor positive in charge therefore zero mass. Electrons and positrons have a charge therefore they have mass. I hope this helps you.
Sep 29, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
This is not true. Because science, as a creation of minds, cannot replace the objects it reflects on. Not only scientists, but also every human look at things in their own way. Despite various reflections upon it, the reality is one. Reflections, however many and ingenious they are, can by no means be called reality. Science is reflections of this kind that are scrutinized by reasoning.
Sep 29, 2010
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (6)
I 'm doing just fine, thanks ;D
Light is massless because it doesn't couple with the Higgs field, and there isn't a "positive and negative end" to the Higgs field (which isn’t spacetime).
I think you mean "dense aether" but you're saying "Higgs field."
That's not just misleading, it's unethical and immoral. You’re deliberately misleading people who come here to understand real science.
Ridiculous - if mass required charge to exist, there'd be no massive neutral particles, but there are plenty: neutrons, pions, kaons, neutrinos, Z bosons, etc. etc.
The eV is a unit of energy; the coulomb is a unit of charge. Oh brother...
Sep 29, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (14)
Space-time is the fabric that makes up the known universe, Higgs field is the field that makes up the known universe, aether is the substance which makes up the known universe. As far as I'm aware we know of only one universe, call it what you will reality does not change.
Light energy is massless, however, it changes form into an electron and a positron ( both of which are massive ), because of a split in neutral charge we are left with two particles of opposite charge one negative ( electron ) one positive ( positron ). Both particles inherit mass due to their energy ( which is the potential of their charge ), mass and energy are interchangeable, which is apparent when they meet and annihilate in a flash of pure energy ( of neutral charge ), light.
Neutrons are comprised of 3 quarks 1 up ( charge of +2/3 ) 2 down ( charge of -1/3 ) equating to a net charge of zero, the neutron is collectively a neutral particle.
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1911
http://prl.aps.or.../e240401
http://prl.aps.or.../e154101
Can it serve as a sufficient argument for relevance of dense aether concept? Ot it's still just an coincidence?
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (5)
Photons are virtual particles. Hawking Radiation is thermal, which would be electromagnetic in nature. You're rather incorrect.Added to the list.
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (12)
High energy photons are the results of particle antiparticle collision. Mass is eradicated and pure energy remains ( massless radiation, light ). Hawking radiation is the division of neutral space, like at the big bang, out of nothing we derive two opposites, these are destined to merge and annihilate, however, with a high energy system annihilation can sometimes be averted, instead of meeting and massively disappearing the two masses remain, one leaves the system in the form of massive radiation at the expense of the other which joins the massive system we label a blackhole. This is the birth of particles. The virtual electron positron pair becomes real due to loss of virtuality, with no positron for the electron to remerge with the electron remains real, or viceversa. A photon does not annihilate with a photon, they are real, they're not a virtual particle pair.
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (3)
You have the majority of it right, however, an anti particle annihilation wouldn't remove energy from the blackhole. It would simply convert the mass to energy which would remain trapped in the blackhole, or would return to the space time fabric.
The energy is "stolen" from the black hole through the kinetic energy that tosses the, no longer virtual, particle out into space. The electromagnetic energy is thereby stolen from the blackhole by the escaping particle.
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (12)
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Matter and energy are one in the same. Focused energy in a single point = matter, with mass, which means black holes don't "fill in".
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (12)
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (12)
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
Sep 30, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Publish it and collect your Nobel prize, otherwise, your false reality is not interesting to us, Zephir.
Oct 01, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (10)
Oct 01, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Lol, this is just too hilarious...he thinks black holes are *actually* holes...lol...
Oct 03, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Oct 03, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Except the explanation leading to his "theory" is based on dense aether theories. I'm pretty sure Ockham said "simplest answer" and not "most frequently falsified answer."
Oct 03, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Additionally, I don't buy Hawking radiation as a viable premise. Hawking failed to account for the GP/KE of the infalling particle (from the VP pair) relative to the black hole.
Oct 04, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)