Research suggests that children's memory may be more reliable than adults' in court cases

User rating: 4.8 / 5 after 8 vote(s)

Scientists found that humans exhibit two types of memory. They call one verbatim trace in which events are recorded very precisely and factually. Children have more verbatim trace but as they mature they develop more and more of a second type of memo ...
Scientists found that humans exhibit two types of memory. They call one "verbatim trace," in which events are recorded very precisely and factually. Children have more "verbatim trace," but as they mature, they develop more and more of a second type of memory: "gist trace," in which they recall the meaning of an event, its emotional flavor, but not precise facts. Gist trace is the most common cause of false memories, occurring most often in adults. Research shows that children are less likely to produce false memories, because gist trace develops slowly. As a result, children's recollections could be more reliable than those of adults, and this could lead to ramifications in the courtroom. This illustration shows the Roman two-faced god, Janus, on trial. Symbolically, his bearded, mature head speaks to judges of yore, while the young boy's head is turned towards the judge of the future. Credit: Zina Deretsky, NSF
The U.S. legal system has long assumed that all testimony is not equally credible, that some witnesses are more reliable than others. In tough cases with child witnesses, it assumes adult witnesses to be more reliable. But what if the legal system had it wrong?


Full story »

All News summaries from Medicine & Health news
All News summaries for March 06, 2008